Friday, April 30, 2010

The FSW Logbook


When I first found out I was going to be starting as a full-time firefighter I sat down to have a drink with a friend, fellow Instructor, and mentor, a retired Deputy District Chief of the Chicago Fire Department. He said, "Tim, Keep a journal." (At the time the Chief thought my name was Tim, which has since become a running joke. When he asked me why I didn't correct him I said, "Chief, I'm just honored to be having a beer with you, you can call me anything you want.") I did that intermittently in the form of writing about significant fires and blogging occasionally. In 2009 I finally decided to start keeping a log of the fires I go to every year. It is a great tool.


 

If you workout seriously you keep a log. You record your sets and reps and weight loads, or you keep track of mileage and time. The idea is to measure progress. The Fire Service Warrior can gain the same kind of advantage from recording the fires and significant incidents he responds to. The FSW Log Book can be a spiral notebook, a binder with loose-leaf sheets, or on a computer. I record my runs on an Excel spreadsheet.



My agency responds to an average of 111.5 Structure Fires per year (in the time I've worked there). I respond to an average of 25. In those responses I may be on the pipe, I may be driving the Truck, I maybe the Engineer of the Still Engine. The Log book helps me keep track of these experiences and learn from them.

Most of us fulfill multiple roles on any fireground, and change positions from shift to shift, or call to call. How many sets and reps are you getting on the Nozzle? How many as the Engineer? How many as the Outside Vent? If you are shifting assignments regularly keeping a log book gives you something you can reference back to; a tool to remember the lessons and learn from them.

At a minimum record the date, address, construction, and your basic observations. How detailed you are depends on what matters for you. This isn't for public consumption, it's your lessons learned. Some folks will need to record more information. I record just some basic memory joggers. Hope this can be one more tool in the toolbox. Cheers!

  





Wednesday, April 28, 2010

NIST Staffing Study

So I have had a chance to read most of the NIST Staffing Study that was released today (I have not spent a lot of time reviewing all the appendices yet) and I have some initial thoughts.

Nothing in this report will come as a surprise to anyone in the fire service. The quick recap is that if you meet NFPA 1710 Standard for four-person companies and 15 people on scene you will be able to effectivly and efficently control a fire in a 2000 square foot, two story residence.

The two most important pieces of data collected (in my opinion) are the "Time to Water on Fire" and "Primary Search".  Getting water on the fire is what makes or breaks the fireground operation.  Primary Search is our best chance of finding savable victims inside the building. 

The results documented by NIST show us that it takes 0:10:16 (h:mm:ss) for a 2 person crew to get water on the fire, 0:09:15 for a three person crew, 0:08:41 for a four person crew, and 0:08:01 for a five person crew.  That is a 10% greater efficiency for 3 people than for 2 and 16% more effective for 4 people than for 2.  Those are interesting numbers, but the time savings becomes critical when we think about flashover.  Fire doubles in size every minute.  If we can cut two minutes off of our time to get water on the fire we have kept the fire from quadrupling in size.  A two minute difference in fire development is the difference between a 25 square foot fire (the corner of a bedroom) and a fully-involved floor.  That is huge!

A three person crew can start a primary search 25% faster than a  2 person crew (0:12:16 for a two person crew vs. 0:09:10 for a three person crew) and a 4 person crew can start 30% faster (0:12:16 for two vs. 0:08:47 for a four person crew).  Once again let's look at the time though.  A four person crew is able to start a primary roughly 3 and a half minutes faster than a two person crew.  If we start taking about the effects on the brain of hypoxia any chance of finding a victim more 3 minutes faster means the difference between a rescue and a removal.

There are plenty of Municipal Officials and Fire Chiefs who will dismiss these results as being "unscientific" because they don't want to say to their population, "Your kids and your house are not worth what it would cost to put four people on a rig.  Good luck."  It's time for elected officials and those sycophant Chiefs who see it as their job to save their own jobs to own up and acknowledge the facts.  If you under staff your Fire Companies you are saying that you do not value the lives of your citizens or your firefighters more than your pet projects and hiring your cronies.

It's a damn shame that none of those bottom feeders will even read this report, and that the media will gloss over it in favor of reporting exactly what one of Tiger Wood's mistresses is having for dinner.  Take care of yourselves Brothers and Sisters.

Staffing Study Released

The NIST Staffing Study has been released.  You can find it HERE!

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

More Decision Making Thoughts

A structure fire is a dynamic microcosm; a world in and of itself, where the properties of Chemistry and Physics develop by consuming the structure. As Fire Service Warriors it is our Duty to quench this unrestrained chemical chain reaction. The fireground is a chaotic environment and we must make critical tactical decisions to bring it under control. If we are going to be effective in suppression fires in a manner that saves lives, and conserves property, we need to understand on an intuitive level what exactly is occurring in the building. We need to look at the fireground as a system. Systems are defined as, "an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole" A structure fire is a system where the combination of: the chemistry of fire behavior; the physics of heat transfer and the movement of gasses in a container; gravity; and the type and quality of the construction of the building, all play a factor in how a fire will develop. In fighting the fire we are attempting to disrupt the natural chemical chain reaction that allows the development of fire, but in doing this we must consider the effects the other components of the system have on our ability, and the effect we have on each component of the system individually and as a whole.

This idea is nothing new. Fire Departments have recognized for many years how interdependent all of these factors are. We teach our folks the importance of coordinated fireground operations and the impact we can have on the whole operation if we do something at the wrong time. A mistimed horizontal ventilation opening in a building that is super heated but oxygen deficient can lead to a Backdraft; if we begin flowing water onto the seat of a well developed fire prior to opening the building up we can force steam down on our people and any victims that may be inside; if we have a basement fire in a building with a large open cockloft we need to make sure that the fire isn't running the cockloft unnoticed.

The difficultly we face in this day and age is that developing a deep understanding of all of these interrelated factors takes experience, and experience takes time to develop. Statistics show us that we are seeing less structure fires. While less fires is a WONDERFUL thing for the communities we serve it has a negative impact on the ability for our Fire Service Warriors to gain the experience they need to synthesize all of this information into a usable whole. Firemen have a trade in the same way Electricians, Carpenters, and Plumbers do. We perform physical tasks to complete a job. This is blue collar work; we use tools and get dirty. We need to consider for a moment that it takes five years of being an Apprentice before an Electrician is considered skilled enough to be trusted on his own, and become a Journeyman. How many 90° Bends will an Apprentice Electrician make in that time; how many 2"x4" Studs will the Apprentice Carpenter nail in place; how many copper joints will the Apprentice Plumber sweat? Each of these tradesmen will likely perform these skills thousands of times during their Apprenticeship, while being supervised and counseled along the way. They will be shown the skill in school and have to demonstrate competency before they are allowed in the field. Then, every year they will return to the schoolhouse to continue to develop their knowledge base and expand their understanding of how an Electrical "System" or a Plumbing "System" or a Framing "System" works. They will be measured and tested and have to demonstrate their abilities both on the job and in written tests. Sound familiar?

There are some key differences in the job of a construction tradesman and a Fire Service Warrior that we have to consider. How many structure fires will the average Apprentice Firefighter fight? How many times will you get to be the Nozzleman, the Outside Vent Man, or the Irons? Will your performance be discussed and critiqued in a way that allows you to learn not only from your experiences, but from the experience of the senior members of your department? In 2009 I personally responded to 25 working fires (I keep a log). That's really not a whole lot when you think about it. Everything we do comes down to the weight lifting concept of sets and repetitions. The more perfect practices of a particular "rep" the better our form gets and the more intuitive the process becomes. How many fireground sets and reps are you getting? In those 25 fires I served in a variety of roles from Engineer to Nozzleman to Search Team to Ventilation Team. How many fires are you responding too? I know in my area that there are entire Departments that aren't seeing 25 fires in a year. We simply do not spend time "in combat" on a regular basis to develop our experience base. What are you doing to make the most of the fires you are getting? Are you recording your lessons learned and thinking about how you can improve your fireground decision making and performance? As a department are you conducting drills and scenario driven training? We have to consider that with a reduction in working structure fires, unless we are spending significant time on the drill ground, and studying their trade, our Fire Service Warriors are not getting the opportunity to practice their skills, synthesize their experiences, and develop the confidence needed to make timely decisions.

In this Chapter I will use the words synthesis and synthesizing quite a bit. Synthesis is, "the combining of the constituent elements of separate material or abstract entities into a single or unified entity (opposed to analysis)." Synthesis, stated another way, is when we create something new out of a collection of ideas, images, signs, or symbols. Conversely analysis is, "the separating of any material or abstract entity into its constituent elements (opposed to synthesis)." So, synthesis can be thought of as assembling a whole while analysis is breaking something down into parts. Think of a jigsaw puzzle. You start with a collection of pieces in a box. Individually the pieces have little or no meaning. As you begin to assemble the pieces however a new "whole" begins to emerge in the assembled image. Most people who assemble puzzles however engage in analysis as well. They study the picture on the front of the box so that they know what the whole is supposed to look like. In this way they are able to recognize patterns as they emerge and place them in relatively "correct" positions while finding more parts. When we are synthesizing into a new whole all the individual images on the fireground it is as if we are trying to assemble a puzzle where there is no top of the box picture, and even if there is some concept of what the finished product will look like, someone keeps cutting pieces into different shapes while we are looking at them.

It is obvious that the fireground is a dynamic environment. We cannot rely on a single mental image of conditions, or on one boilerplate plan for every fire. In order to make reasonably well informed decisions, we need to understand the role that Situational Awareness plays in our ability to stay safe on the fireground. We must recognize the role our personal condition plays in our capacity to make decisions. While it seems obvious to say, we need to develop a dynamic thought process that is an aid when we are analyzing the incomplete and imperfect information that is available on the fireground. In order to think in a dynamic fashion we need to have a solid foundation in our basic skills, the "Fundamentals" we discussed in Chapter Four. Without those "Fundamentals" we cannot have a reasonable Self-Confidence. As well known survival skill instructor Bruce Siddle has said, "Confidence implies a mental state which is void of fear, anxiety or self doubt." If you do not have confidence in your skills and capability on the fireground you are more likely to be overwhelmed on the fireground. Being overwhelmed leads to the dreaded "paralysis of analysis". Our decisions have real-world, life or limb threatening consequences. If you make a bad decision it can kill you or put you in a burn unit. That doesn't include the likelihood of a bad decision resulting in the death of one of our "customers" or the unneeded destruction of property. For some people this very real factor inhibits their decision making ability. They worry about making the wrong decision and in the end delay or avoid making a decision all together. The United States Marine Corps, in their doctrinal publication Warfighting (MCDP-1), address this very real concern.

If we fail to make a decision out of lack of will, we have willingly surrendered the initiative to our foe. If we consciously postpone taking action for some reason, that is a decision. Thus, as a basis for action, any decision is generally better than no decision.


 

This same concept hold true on the fireground. Fire is our foe; it is our enemy. Our enemy has the capacity to seize the initiative if we allow it to through our inaction or delay. We need to acknowledge that decision making is a skill set that comes naturally to some and not to others. This is a realization of the wide variety of individual personal traits, not a value judgment. Just because you do not naturally make a quick decision doesn't make you a bad person, or even a bad firefighter.

My wife hates the fact that I make decisions in 30 seconds or less. She thinks about options, analyzes, I would say agonizes, and in general hates to be rushed to judgment. When we first met she did not understand how, if I was presented with a list of three options, I would pick something before she even finished reading the list. I finally explained it to her like this: In my job I have to make decisions in a fraction of a second, and I have to trust my life with those decisions. When you look at life that way it tends to stream line the thought process. My wife is a First Grade Teacher. Unlike the world we operate in there is rarely an event that has to be handled instantly to avoid disastrous consequences. She cannot make a quick decision that fails to consider what the long term effects may be on a particular student. Her attitude is that she is there as much to teach her kids how to be students as much as it is to teach them phonics. With that understanding she cautiously evaluates options to see how they will impact the learning environment over the course of years. Our two styles are the difference between Strategic Planning and Emergency Operations. When we are developing long-range strategic plans, such as capital investment, or a potential reduction in service, we need to slow down the thought process and ensure that all options have be weighed and measured for their downstream effects. Conversely when we are focused on emergency operations, we will have to make decisions without 100% of the data, and do it in a timely manner. The 60% correct answer right now is often more effective than the 100% right answer two minutes too late.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Apparatus Positioning

The embedded video from Sacramento Fire is a textbook example of Apparatus Placement.

This works because the Engine Company is able to stretch off the rear.  If they had pulled a cross-lay the Truck would not have had the front of the building.

Be Safe.


Saturday, April 24, 2010

Line of Duty Death Reports

NIOSH has recently released their report of the Houston Fire Department Line of Duty Deaths that occurred on April 12, 2009.  The report can be found here: NIOSH LODD F2009-11
The Texas State Fire Marshal's report can be found here: Texas Fire Marshal Report

Some interesting points are made about the rapid changes in conditions that can occur because of wind driven fires.

Honor our fallen brothers by learning the lessons from their loss.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Interesting Training Video


Find more videos like this on firevideo.net

This is an excellent video to work on your size-up skills.
What is the building construction?
How big is the building?
Where is the fire?

Now, as the fire unfolds think about your assignment on the fireground and what you would be/should be doing based on conditions.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Progress Report

Just a quick update on conditions.

Progress on the book is moving forward steadily.  I have sent my introduction, Chapter 1 and 2 to some of my inside crew for review and I am working on selecting photos for those Chapters.  Thanks to Dennis Walus of Detroit Fireground Images for his additions!  I am in the middle of a big rewrite on Chapter 3 to incorporate a bunch of research.

I've developed a 3 hour version of the Fireground Tactical Decision Making class and have presented the core class to over 120 participants.

Be Safe.








Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Mourning a Brother Lost

Last evening, March 30th, Firefighter Brian Carey of the Homewood Fire Department, Homewood, Illinois, died in the line of duty. His partner, Karra Kopas, was seriously burned, and has a hard recovery ahead of her. Brian was a 28 year-old young man; Karra is a 21 year-old young woman.

It will be some time before the investigation into this incident reveals details of what happened. Based on the published reports in the Chicago Tribune, and the Southtown Star newspapers it sounds like there was a flashover. The crews on scene had one elderly resident out of the building and knew there was a wheel-chair bound man still inside.

I feel I can say this right now today, without a full investigation or report, that Brian Carey died living up to the fire service virtues of Honor, Courage, and Duty. Karra is going to have to suffer through treatments, and the recovery that comes from critical burns, for living with every ounce of her character our mission: To Save Lives and Property.

Brian and Karra are examples of the Fire Service Warriors I am proud to call my brothers and sisters. It is their obvious selflessness, courage, and sense of duty that I believe we need to honor in the fire service.

The calling of the Warrior is not for everyone. It requires selflessness and self-control that are not encouraged in this 21st Century world. We live in a culture that promotes luxury as being a "right" and hardships as something that are beneath us. The Warrior, be he a Fire Service Warrior or one of our fellow Warriors in the Military or Law Enforcement know this isn't the case. Hardships are the reality of the world. Having the strength to accept the way of a Warrior is an acceptance of the difficult and the dangerous. It is accepting a life of hardship, pain, and continual self-control.

It requires a certain heroic quality just to accept a position that you know will place you in harms way, keep you from your family at the holidays, and force you to confront physical and mental challenges. You will be wet, cold, and tired far more often than you want to. You will likely be injured at some point in your career. Think of the words of Chief Edward Croker, FDNY, who said:

"Firemen are going to be killed right along. They know it, every man of them... firefighting is a hazardous occupation; it is dangerous on the face of it, tackling a burning building. The risks are plain.... Consequently, when a man becomes a fireman, his act of bravery has already been accomplished."


 

This is why true Warriors have been revered as long as stories of their exploits have been recounted. It is written that in 500B.C. Heraclitus, the pre-Socratic philosopher said,

Of every 100 men, 10 should not even be here, 80 are nothing more than targets. Nine of them are real fighters. We are lucky to have them, they the battle make. Ah but the one. One of them is a warrior and he will bring the others back.


 

Brian died last night living that very role, the role of the "one". My thoughts and prayers are with his family (his natural family and his fire service family) as they confront his loss. I hope that they can find solace in the fact that he died a hero's death, trying to rescue a neighbor who he had sworn an oath to protect. Brian has joined the heroes who have gone ahead.

Karra, my thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover. You are a Fire Service Warrior. You lived your duty and risked your life to try and save your neighbor. Stay strong, stay positive, and get back to the firehouse.


 

Friday, March 12, 2010

The Ready Position

I just got the official word that PennWell Publishing/Fire Engineering Books will be publishing my book. Now I just need to finish it! Hopefully you all will get your chance to buy "The Ready Position" at FDIC 2011!

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Twitter

I'm now on Twitter.  You can follow my occasionally witty musings by following this link to ChrisFSW

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Quick Update

Just a quick update.  I am working daily on completing The Ready Position, a book length treatment of my thoughts on the world of a Fire Service Warrior.

I have scheduled five 3-hour sessions of Fireground Tactical Decision Making.  These are all closed classes for specific agencies.  I may put together an open-enrollment course for June.  Details to follow.

Be Safe.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Fireground Tactical Decison Making Classes

I've formalize the process a bit for Departments that want to host a Fireground Tactical Decision Making Class.

The course is available in a one hour and forty-five minute session, that is the same class that will be presented at the Fire Department Instructor's Conference this year.  This is a perfect shift drill.  The Shift Drill format costs $215.00 per session for groups of up to 30 students in the Chicago area.  Students will receive a copy of the PowerPoint Handouts, and a Certificate of Attendance.  Discounted rate of $600.00 for Departments that book three consecutive shift days.

Custom sessions can be crafted for larger groups, or to incorporate your Department's Standard Operating Guidelines, or Tactical Scenarios, at affordable rates.  For agencies outside the Chicago Metro-Area (more than 30 miles one-way drive) email me for a quote.

Please contact me to schedule courses or talk about options for a custom session.


Thursday, February 11, 2010

To Absent Friends

February 11th, 1998 my friend Tony Lockhart died when he became disoriented and ran out of air inside a tire shop at 106th and Western Ave. I was there. I got there after the fire had gone to shit and didn’t find out Tony was missing until probably 20 minutes after I got there. I want to say that was about 11:00 p.m. I stayed that night until 2 a.m. or so when they recovered and removed Tony’s body and the body of Pat King, another firemen who died in the same fire. Could Tony or Pat have been saved? Possibly, if the level of training in Firefighter Survival and Rescue that is now widely available had been taught back then.

I know for me Tony’s death served as a focal point of why one must take this job seriously. I can’t say I’ve ever felt “Oh shit, I’m dead,” in the moment of fighting a fire… for me I am so focused on doing what has to be done that there is little “fear”, more a calculating though process. The fear comes afterwards. When you realize that putting your foot through a hole in the floor could have been really bad, or when you think about “What if…”, “What if I hadn’t gotten the hose unkinked?”, “What if those guys hadn’t gotten the windows taken out?”… those are the things that stick with you. Death is something that each of us needs to come to grips with in his own way. For me I have what some would say is a fatalistic attitude… if it’s meant to be, then it’s meant to be. I prefer to think of it as old fashioned Stoicism; I do not worry about that which I cannot control.

I just assume that if it’s my day then it won’t matter if I’m crawling down a shitty hallway or that I choke on a piece of broccoli that is how things go. We all die. I don’t even think that Mayor in Brazil who outlawed death can avoid it. It isn’t something to be feared, unless you live your life in fear. If you spend everyday afraid to live life to the fullest, afraid to embrace opportunities, to take chances and to live like you have nothing to loose then you will die scared and full of regret. To borrow a few lines from Jonathan Larson:
“… forget regret, or life is yours to miss… no day but today.”

I love my job. I love what I do and if it is in the grand plan of the Universe that I should fall doing something that I believe is noble and honorable and love then I think that I will have achieved something few people ever do.

That is one of my biggest problems with where the fire service has headed since 9/11. People call the deaths of those 343 brave men tragic. It wasn't tragic, it was honorable. The deaths of the innocent men and women who died in the twin towers, or on Flight 93 were tragic. They had little choice in the events that unfolded. Those brave members of the FDNY on duty that day knew that they were entering a building that could very well kill them. They selflessly, and without any hesitation, climbed those stairwells to engage in a battle to save lives, as the bodies of people trapped above the fire crashed into the streets around them. They saved thousands of people that day, and they died as heroes.

I hope that the work I do, the idea of promoting the culture of the Fire Service Warrior, is a fitting way of honoring Tony, Pat and the thousands of selfless, courageous, and honorable brothers and sisters who have left us too soon. So tonight I will hoist a glass to the memory of Tony, and honor him and my brothers and sisters who have paid the ultimate price.

God Speed, Brother. You are missed.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Virtues Survey

I am asking interested firefighters to complete my Virtue Survey . Please rate the seven virtues of: Honor, Courage, Loyalty, Respect, Integrity, Duty, and Selflessness from most to least important. Thank you in advance for your help.

Be Safe

More Fireground Tactical Decison Making Classes

Well, I have scheduled 5 more confirmed Fireground Tactical Decision Making Classes before FDIC> They are closed classes, but I am officially taking the show on the road now. Currently I am offering a two-hour or three-hour course design as a Shift Drill or Weekly Drill. If you are interested in hosting please email me for details.

Be Safe.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

The Ready Position – A Fire Service Warrior’s Personal Condition

    "Be Prepared" is the motto of the Boy Scouts, and it is a theory that firefighters the world over should ascribe to. As a firefighter, being prepared means placing yourself into a Ready Position, being prepared for the physical and psychological stresses that you will face each and every day. The Ready Position is an idealized state of Personal Condition. Personal Condition is a term that is used in a variety of ways in the psychology/sociology communities to represent what a person "brings to the table".

For my purposes Personal Condition will be defined as "a firefighter's ability to respond to the psychological and physiological stresses of firefighting as governed by his training, experience, and belief systems." Regardless of how prepared we are on any given day, or given response, we all have a Personal Condition. For the Fire Service Warrior, the Ready Position is "the state of readiness where a fireman is at the peak ability to emotionally, cognitively and physically perform offensive operations on the fireground." When you are in the Ready Position you are prepared for the known general conditions that are present at every emergency response and for the unknowable specifics that you must process on your arrival. If the Ready Position is our ideal condition we will call the opposite end of the spectrum unprepared. Along the way we hit milestones in our readiness. Each one of us falls somewhere along this continuum on any given day. Our goal must be to strive for the Ready Position every day, and on every call.

Physical Readiness

    For the Fire Service Warrior the "easier" state of readiness to achieve is that of Physical Readiness. I use the term easier with tongue firmly in cheek. The level of physical fitness that is required to prepare for the physiological stress of the fireground is anything but easy, but compared to the demands of forging mental readiness it is simpler to track and measure.

I've said before, firefighting is combat. Like combat, firefighting requires us to engage in physically and psychologically stressful tasks. The effects on the body are multifold. The exertion of firefighting is equivalent to the metabolic effort engaged in by Navy SEALs and professional Boxers. To effectively combat the effects of physiological and psychological stress firefighters should maintain a level of physical fitness that is commonly associated with elite athletes.

    Firefighting is not the same as running marathons however. A significant portion of what we are called upon to do demands strenuous muscular effort. Forcing doors, pulling ceilings, raising ladders, advancing hoselines, and carrying victims all require muscular strength and endurance. In order to properly prepare for the physical challenges, a fireman needs to couple strength training with metabolic training.

Training for the Physical Battle


 

    In order to develop the strength required for firefighting we need to examine the kind of work we do as firefighters and what types of exercises will be most beneficial. As firefighters, we perform motions that are rarely mimicked by isolation exercises. Our efforts require the use of multiple muscle groups working together. Let's examine the act of pulling a drywall ceiling. Essentially you can "pull" or "push" using a pike pole to bring the ceiling down. If you take a minute and think about what hurts when you finish pulling several rooms of ceiling you being to realize you are using a significant number of muscles, including the "quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, abdominals, torso rotators, lower back stabilizers, deltoids, trapezius, triceps, biceps, and muscles of the forearm and hand (grip)". These muscles are being used at the same time and in the eccentric, concentric, and isometric movements. This "simple" act of pulling ceiling requires the Central Nervous System to coordinate all of these movements, and you need to have sufficient strength, endurance, and flexibility to perform the action.

The need to develop effective physical fitness in the Fire Service has been recognized. The International Fire Chiefs and the International Association of Firefighters have partnered to create the "Wellness-Fitness Initiative" (WFI) to promote physical fitness and mental wellness. An outgrowth of the WFI movement has been the Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT). The CPAT is designed as a screening tool to see if prospective candidates have the basic physical ability to perform essential fireground tasks. The "Peer Fitness Trainer" program is another means that the Wellness Fitness Initiative has developed to promote physical fitness. Peer Fitness Trainers are certified by the American Council on Exercise as Personal Trainers with a specific background in the fitness methods advocated by the WFI.

Outside of the "official" fire service fitness programs, there are fitness "movements" that have caught on in the fire service, law enforcement and military community. One in particular is CrossFit. CrossFit is a fitness philosophy and community founded by Greg and Laura Glassman. Their fitness methodology can best be summed up as "broad, general and inclusive" and is marked by their fitness prescription of "constantly varied, high intensity, functional movements." To accomplish this goal the CrossFit community advocates training in functional lifting using power-lifting and Olympic-lifting movements, gymnastics skills, and interval type training. They also use their trademark "Girls" and "Hero" workouts, which are generally couplets and triplets of movements involving both strength and "cardio" movements performed for time. Fire Departments and firemen around the country are using CrossFit's methods and work-outs to prepare for the physical challenges of the job.

There are many methods out there for getting fit; the key is picking one that focuses on the skills of the fireman: lift, carry, pull, push and chop; with the intensity that mimics that of the fireground. While developing the fitness level of a Navy SEAL, a Boxer, or an Olympic Cyclist may seem extreme, the facts support our need to do so. One of the roadblocks to getting firemen to train the way they should is the fact that an exercise program that is sufficiently intense to prepare you adequately for the rigors of firefighting HURTS. Squatting, Pressing, and Dead Lifting weights heavy enough to develop the strength needed to grasp the SCBA harness straps of a downed firefighter and drag him from a building is going to be hard work.

Maybe you feel like you don't need to have the strength to drag a 300# firefighter from a building unaided. You're wrong. You should be able to at least BEGIN to rescue your partner if he or she suddenly becomes incapacitated inside a structure fire. Yes, you are going to call a RIT Team, you are going to have help eventually, but you cannot just sit there and wait. Beyond the possibility of having to rescue your partner there are the very real physical demands that "normal" operations place on our bodies. Published literature has shown that firefighters performing fire ground operations during interior structural firefighting commonly reach heart rates of 164bpm to 183bpm.
This is a significant work load. The fitter you are, the greater work capacity you have; the greater your work capacity, the more controlled your heart rate and breathing will be while performing strenuous fireground tasks. In short, the fitter you are the more likely you are to survive on the fireground.

Measuring Your Progress

You need to be able to perform to a standard that measures your ability, be it the Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT), the CrossFit work out of the day (WOD) Fran, or a program of your own design. Numbers don't lie. You can measure the success of your fitness program by recording defined parameters over the course of time. Test yourself: hop on the treadmill in full turn out gear, with your SCBA, and walk at 4 miles per hour, until your low air alarm activates. How many minutes were you on air? What was your resting heart rate when you began? What was your heart rate one minute after finishing? Now, engage in your planned exercise program for six weeks to eight weeks. Retest yourself. Did your numbers improve? If they did you are on the right track, and if they didn't you are probably not working out efficiently. However you measure your efforts the key is to see progress. By using the research into the metabolic energy that firefighters typically expend as a yard stick you can evaluate your personal level of fitness against a standard and determine if you are preparing for the challenges of firefighting.

Mental Readiness

Firefighting challenges us mentally as well physically. In discussing hoe we prepare for the mental aspects of firefighting we are grouping two key areas of psychology under one umbrella. We must be prepared for the impact of stress on our cognitive abilities, as well as our emotional health.

    When you consider the environment that firemen operate in there are two primary "action states". You are either "at rest", around the firehouse or conducting a non-emergency routine assignment or you are "working", engaged in mitigating an emergency that is putting someone's life in danger and may kill or injure you. I'm going to restate for the sake of understanding that I am addressing fireground operations for the most part. For many departments EMS, and Fire Prevention are the bulk of their daily duties, with "still alarm" type incidents, rubbish fires, auto fires, and the like, filling in the rest of the day. Few departments are responding to a structure fire every day, and those that are generally see that duty spread across various companies. This reality should emphasize our need to think about how we prepare for the mental challenges found in firefighting. That preparation will carry over into being prepared for any eventuality.

    One of our challenges in preparing for the mental impact of emergency response is that we do not have a set-aside time to "put our game face on". We rapidly shift from one state of being to another when a call is dispatched. Being mentally prepared, therefore, must be continually strived for.

    To be ready for our "Action State" we must have a solid foundation in Situational Awareness and Fireground Tactical Decision Making. These skills cannot be underestimated. Utilizing a mental model like the Boyd Loop focuses you as you Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act. This system helps you control how your brain processes information. The most effective way of confronting a difficult situation is to have a procedure to fall back on. In the fire service we have procedures and guidelines that tell us when we are going to perform maintenance on our apparatus, what tool we will take based on our riding assignment, and checklists for how to call a MAYDAY. You can choose to incorporate the Boyd Loop into your personal condition as a way of gathering and interpreting information on the fireground. By doing this regularly you will have a mental model that you can use if you suddenly find yourself in a truly life threatening situation, like a sudden change in conditions that may lead to disorientation.

Challenges

The mental challenges that we find on the fireground come from several sources. First we have the anxiety brought on by behaving in an abnormal fashion. It is not "normal" to run into a burning building, and our brains recognize this. Secondly there is the stress associated with confronting traumatic circumstances. The reality of being a firefighter is that you will deal with people in their worst moments, you will be faced with the dead and the dying, and you will have to untangle broken, mangled, and maimed people. It is imperative that we develop a means of forging mental readiness for these potentially difficult situations.

    Preparing for the effects of fear induced anxiety requires an understanding of how our body responds to psychological stress. When we face a life threatening situation our body engages the well known "fight or flight" response. This is the body marshaling resources to protect itself and causes a shift from parasympathetic to the sympathetic nervous system. An uncontrolled SNS reaction can lead directly to a chain reaction of negative consequences that impair the cognitive function, and the ability to use your senses to gather information from the world around you. Controlling your breathing, as a biofeedback technique, can help slow an anxiety induced elevated heart rate and allow you to regain your cognitive function.

     Preparing for the emotional challenges of firefighting is another important aspect of mental readiness. From personal experience and non-scientific observations of literally thousands of firefighters, police officers and military members around the world I have come to the conclusion that how an individual views him or her-self is the key factor in coping with the emotionally stressful elements of our profession. We each view the world through a prism that gathers outside information and compares it to our view of the world. In Boyd Theory his is a synthesis that occurs in the Orientation phase. For the sake of clarity I am going to use the term Life Stance to describe the synthesis of philosophical and religious learning that you have to frame your concept of life.

Stoicism

Stoicism is one way, practiced by warriors for thousands of years, to deal with stressful situations. Stoicism is "indifference to pleasure or pain." The idea of the stoics was to accept that there are things we cannot control and to not be affected by them. Epictetus, a stoic sage whose teachings were recorded by his students, says in The Handbook, "Some things are in our control and others not." He goes on to say "Things not in our control are body, property, reputation, command, and, in one word, whatever are not our own actions". His meaning is that we do not get to choose if we will be 6'2" or 5'3"; we do not get to control if we are born into wealth or poverty; we have no say in how others will interpret our actions.

    We do have the ability to choose how we will respond to the actions of others, and to the circumstances we are faced with. Say you are assigned to the first due Truck Company on the scene of a structure fire in a single family home. In the bedroom just off the fire room you find the unconscious body of a 7 year-old girl. You notify command and remove her from the building to a waiting EMS unit. After the fire you find out that she was pronounced dead at the hospital. How will you choose to respond? Some people will shrug the situation off as "unavoidable" or "not my fault" others will become emotionally stressed by the situation.

    

    Epictetus would likely say: "Men are disturbed, not by things, but by the principles and notions which they form concerning things. Death, for instance, is not terrible; else it would have appeared so to Socrates. But the terror consists in our notion of death that it is terrible." In other words the death of the girl should not affect you, unless you had personal control over it. Did you perform your job within the scope of your training and to the best of your ability? Were you physically and mentally prepared for your assignment? Did you know your riding position, tool assignment, and role based on Department Standard Operating Guidelines? If you can answer yes to these questions then there is little likelihood that you had control over ANY of the circumstances that lead to the young girl's death. The zealous stoic would say that you should be unaffected by this; it was not within your control. The ideal of stoicism is very different from the reality of human emotion and interaction. Anyone who is emotionally healthy will be affected by the death of a seven year-old. Even though children die everyday the normal person will see this as a "bad", "upsetting", "unnatural" occurrence. The reason for this is we see children as being innocent, incomplete, and full of potential. The death of a young child seems wrong to us because that child hasn't had a chance to become something greater. These are all reasonable reactions. The key is to have developed a "dimmer switch" that helps us not become emotionally handicapped by our reactions to the daily horrors we face. Our training, experience, and or life stance all impact our ability to handle the emotional stress of our position in a healthy way.

Training is perhaps the "easiest" starting point. Our training occurs in three key ways: formal classes, company level, and individual study. Formal classes are the prevue of state regulatory agencies and fire departments. An organization can provide personnel an introduction to the emotional realities they will face. The adage "forewarned is forearmed" is entirely appropriate. There are departments that have veteran firefighters who have been burned, or injured, present their stories to recruit classes during Fire Academy. This is valuable because it takes the abstract idea of the dangers of the fireground and makes it real for the new recruits. An introduction to the psychological challenges that may be faced should occur during recruit training to enable the individual to begin forming a coping system. Training should detail common reactions to psychological stress, unhealthy behaviors to watch for, and offer strategies for coping with the emotional challenges of being a first responder. When it comes to dealing with emotionally challenging situations that occur during normal operations we can work with our people informally on a Company level. Having veteran personnel share situations like our example, in "kitchen table" sessions offers newer members a chance to learn from the experiences of more experienced members. When we look at preparing for the psychological stresses of firefighting we need to study ourselves and by ourselves to adequately prepare. Knowing yourself means having a clear understanding of how you respond to stress. As individuals we can study stoic philosophy, read about choice theory, or find another means of preparing for the expected stress of our position.

Experience is a more elusive tutor. I can't remember who first told me, "Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted." Truer words have never been spoken. You do not know how a situation will affect you until you have been through it. You build the foundation for how you cope with each successive exposure. Consider for a moment the stereotypical "inner-city fireman" who, because of repeated exposures to emotionally stressful circumstances, without a healthy coping skills, suffers "burn-out". What happens? He begins to hate the job he once loved and dreads having to go to work. Our experiences both in and out of the fire service lay a foundation for how we respond to stress.

Your life stance can be any religious, spiritual, or philosophical system, or combination of them all, you live your life by. It may be something that you were raised with, or it may be something you have chosen for yourself. Regardless of how you came by the prism you view the world through, you have one and it is uniquely yours. Understanding how that foundation impacts your thoughts and your response to stress will allow you to choose how to use that system, to live a healthy life style.

Choice and Self-Control

Most people will say that they just react and that they cannot do anything about it. This is where the lessons of the stoics can help us develop a means of controlling how we respond to emotionally challenging situations. You can choose how you will respond. The choices you make in response to the events that impact you or the way you are treated are 100% within your control. You can choose to relinquish control over your thoughts and your emotions by allowing yourself to react to the things that others do or say, but that is a choice. Rather than "react" we as individuals need to respond to the "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" in a thoughtful and constructive manner.

At some point in each of our lives we have heard a co-worker, friend, lover, parent or partner say, "You make me feel (fill in emotion)", we have probably said it ourselves. The reality is that no one can make us feel anything, nor can we make anyone feel a particular emotion. I can MAKE you feel pain if I pick up a baseball bat and hit you in the head, but I can't make you feel worthless as a person. We choose to feel hurt or sad or worthless based upon the credence we give the words, or actions, of another person. That is a tremendous amount of personal power that we relinquish when we allow others to hold sway over us like that.

Choosing how you respond to an individual's words and actions directed specifically towards you is one step on the road of mastering your personal condition. Our example of the young girl is the next step in choosing how we will respond. This a circumstance where responding in a sympathetic manner is appropriate: you can acknowledge that the family of the girl must be devastated, while accepting that you are not responsible for her death. You did your job to the best of your ability to rapidly locate and remove her from the structure. You transferred her to the best available medical treatment. You acted in accordance with the accepted practices of your organization and within the scope of your training. You can "choose" to feel personally responsible, or you can accept that people everyday die. Some people die in horrible ways like suffocating in a fire, others "peacefully" in their sleep. Some people die as children, others live to be over a hundred years old. You have no control over who dies when, unless you specifically commit an act that kills them.

The Ready Position

In order to be in the Ready Position you must master both your physical and mental condition. Mastering these two primary components of your Personal Condition requires thoughtful analysis of yourself. The Swiss Psychologist Carl Jung is credited with saying, "One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious." This applies to how we approach our own physical and mental readiness. You have to understand your strengths as well as your limitations in order to maximize your abilities, and be prepared for the challenges of the fireground. Once you understand your personal condition you can see where you are along the path to the Ready Position. Then the real work begins. You will not get to the Ready Position by working on your strengths, but by focusing on your weaknesses. Diligent effort, focus, and study will prepare you for the physical and mental challenges you will face daily on and off the job.


 

    

Reader Feedback

I received an email today from Pat, who sat down to read my Mental Readiness post.


 

Wow - Christopher - from the photograph on your 'Mental Readiness' article - you appear to be a young man, not someone from the 1960's. I'm surprised you would use such a term as "firemen" or "fireman". 

We are not "police-men" or "fire-men" or "fisher-men" any more. You may not have a woman in the fire service - but there are women in the fire service. 

I didn't even bother reading the rest of the article for fear of other stereotypes.

Sincerely,

Pat


 


 

I really took some time to think about Pat's email. Pat's concern is a valid one. People use words everyday with out really thinking about how they may be understood by others. While I may mean a word to be taken in a certain context, a reader might not perceive it that way. One of the challenges I face as a writer is that I write the way I speak, but if you come in to the middle of my conversation you may be offended by something I say. Below is my reply to Pat's email.


 

Pat,

Thanks for the feedback. In an earlier post, which was also published by Fire Engineering, I wrote:

It is my view of what each and every one of us who call ourselves a fireman should aspire to. I am going to use the word fireman here rather than the more gender neutral firefighter. You the reader need to be able to distinguish a particular meaning in what I'm saying. For my purposes a firefighter is someone who has a job working for the fire department, but may not have a love for the job that inspires them to be the best. We all have met people who are just in this job for the badge, the pension, or the time off. A fireman on the other hand is anyone, male or female, who has chosen to embrace the ideals of the Fire Service Warrior.

I realize that the word "fireman" has gender implications. Several women I know in the fire service are honored to use the term fireman to apply to themselves, and do so regularly. I debated painting a picture using "firefighter" and "employee of the fire department" instead of "fireman" and "firefighter." I felt that is was clumsy writing though, and did not flow as well. You are the first person who has raised this as a problem with me, and I hope you believe me when I say I am going to spend some time thinking about this. The difficulty as a writer is trying to find a happy balance between interesting narrative and communicating with the widest spectrum of readers.

I hope that my elaboration will assuage your concerns about stereotypes and that you will give the information a read and tell me what you think about the information presented. Thank you for emailing me. A lot of people would have just blackballed the info and ignored it, but never given the author a chance to learn from your thoughts. Be safe.

Chris


 

I was honored that Pat took the time to write. I am not all knowing, and I love to learn from the people who take the time to read this blog. Don't hesitate to email me. Pat, thanks again for writing.


 

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Fireground Tactical Decision Making

I am presenting Fireground Tactical Decision Making this week for the duty crews in Itasca and Wood Dale. The class is going well, and I am getting great feedback.

For anyone interested in hosting Fireground Tactical Decision Making at your department, it makes a great shift drill and will get your people thinking. Please leave a comment or email me at thefireservicewarrior@gmail.com and I will happily quote you a price.

Be Safe.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

FDIC 2010

I am going to be presenting Fireground Tactical Decision Making at the Fire Department Instructor's Conference in Indianapolis this year. http://www.fdic.com/index.html

The class is an one hour and forty-five minute overview of key concepts in Situational Awareness, Disorientation, and John Boyd's OODA Loop Theory. The class culminates in several "practice" sessions where attendees will get to apply the concepts in Tactical Exercises.

I'm scheduled to present on Thursday, April 22nd at 1:30pm.

For those in the Chicago-Metro area, I will be conducting a pilot class next week January 19, 20 & 21. If you can't make FDIC, or would like a preview, email me or leave a comment. There are a limited number of spots available.