Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Frank Brannigan Was Wrong...

Bold words from some random guy blogging, I know but I think I am onto something here.  Francis Brannigan, a Fire Protection Engineer who many of us know from his writing on building construction and his classic text Building Construction for the Fire Service, used to say, "The Building is your enemy; know your enemy!"  He was wrong.  The Building is the battleground, it is the terrain in which we and the enemy do battle.



Fire is the enemy and fire behavior is a predictiable indication of how the enemy will behave.  If we look at line of duty death and injury statistics we see far too many of our brothers and sisters being injured or killed because of fire development.  Just last week Mark Falkenhan-FF/Medic, Lutherville Volunteer Fire Company, Baltimore County FD was killed after being trapped in what sounds like flashover conditions. On Sunday a woman and three firefighters were injured at a building fire in Springfield, Virgina.

The video below show us the progression of the fireground.  Dave Statter has some good comments about this over at his blog.



We can get into a debate (I suppose) about exactly what fire behavior we are seeing.  It is not a backdraft.  It is not a smoke explosion.  This is a rapid spread of fire because of (probably) ineffective ventilation techniques. I'm not going to launch into some Tactics diatribe here because I do not know exactly what occurred at this fire.  I don't know if this was a townhouse type building where the second floor was a different occupancy.  I don't know if they pulled up with a two person Engine and one person on the Truck.  Something different did have to occur for that fire to be vented in a way that prevented the spread of fire over the heads of the attack team.

What we can talk about is the fire progression and why the fire spread was predicable.

Look at the smoke conditions at the start of the video.  This entire building is heavily charged.  The structure of the building is involved.  The fire is deep seated.  Based on info from http://www.wunderground.com the temperature was in the low 20's(F).  The somewhat "lazy" nature of the smoke once it is outside the building is due to the temperature. The key factors though should be the volume of dense smoke we see and the color.  We have to recognize that if it was 65 degrees outside this smoke would push away from the building with great velocity.  In this case it is "pushing" out pretty hard but then hanging more than we would normally expect from a hot fire.  WHY?  Because the "fluid" that is unburned products of combustion carried by heat contracts and slows when it hits that cold air.

Something worth considering is the inherent relationship between temperature and pressure.

How well do your firefighters understand Boyle's Law and Charles's law of fluid dynamics?  I know, I know, that's HazMat... right?  Maybe I'm biased to looking at this through a lens of Chemical and Physical properties because I just got back from a validating committee for a HazMat Technician Text Book.

Charles's Law simple says that as temperature increases so does pressure in a closed container.  Boyle's Law tells us that if you keep temperatue constant as pressure doubles volume halves/ as volume doubles pressure is halved.  In other words if you give a fluid more space the pressure is lessened, if you give it less space pressure increases.  Here is where they come together. As temperature is building because of unrestrained fire the pressure in the building begins to increase.  If the building was perfectly sealed that increase in pressure would eventually smother the fire by consuming oxygen.  If it cools off the fire goes out and all the unburnned products of combustion just congeal on surfaces.

However, once we allow the building to ventilate (in any manner) we create a place for that "fluid" to go.  However because it is a small opening relative to the amount of product temperature and pressure continue to build.  The exiting "fluid" is heated but to rich to burn (I know, more HazMat).

At the 1:45 mark you can see flame in the C/D corner window on the D side (if you call the front door side of the building where the truck is parked A).  In 15 seconds heavy fire is venting out the window.  30 seconds after the flame is viable we can see through the A/D corner window the fire is extending.  Three seconds later (2:14) the unburned fuel that is exiting the front lights up.  Once it lights up you will notice that the smoke is moving a lot faster up and away.  That's because the heat is now outside and overcoming the slowing/contracting effect of the ambient temperature.

We MUST study these fires and understand what is happening in the building.  I was in Tulsa over the weekend and spent a few minutes talking with Ed Hartin who teaches extensively about Compartment Fire Behavior Training  Ed is a Fire Behavior guy.  We talked about how it is the lack of knowledge about Fire Behavior that is getting us hurt and killed on the fireground.  While fire behavior may not be predictable with 100% accuracy I venture to say if you are a student of this trade we can get close to 95%.  We don't know until we are inside the compartment what effect the layout may have on fire growth and spread.  However we should understand intuitively what the smoke conditions are telling us about the growth, stage, and location of the fire.

The building is the battleground, and warriors going back as far as Sun Tzu have taught us how important it is to understand the terrain. The ENEMY though is the fire.  You can know all you want about the terrain but if you do not know what the ENEMY is going to do you will still end up killed.  The Fire is Your Enemy, Know You Enemy; The Building is the Battleground, Know the Terrain.

4 comments:

  1. Another good piece of work here. Brannigan would probably agree with you at least in part. The terrain of the battle and the chemistry of the enemy is what has changed over time. Fire only reacts to its enviroment and as long as we humans continue to build things out of composite materials that don't stand up to heat and then fill those buildings with things made from hydrocarbons we will continue battling a brutal enemy.

    Understanding building construction is imperative to our jobs, not because they are the enemy but because they dictate how fire will behave and how long we have to make a difference. Fire behavior is crucial but you must understand the current chemistry of fire. As I cleaned out my basement recently I found my bible (IFSTA 1st edition) from my entry into the fire service. Flipping through the pages made me think of how things are the same and how they have changed. We have a few new tools, pumps are bigger, we use better rope,some folks put foam on fires and we have much better/faster detection systems but we have not added too many tools to the arsenal. Fire, though has changed, the time/temperature curve has changed, fuel production has changed, smoke chemistry has changed and water still only absorbs a given number of BTUs per gallon.

    Know you buildings because it is the best way to predict what effect fire will have on them. Study the videos of smoke and fire, understand the way the enemy moves under different conditions, so you can, as Sun Tzu (yeah I'm a geek too) teaches, cut off your enemy's escape before you go in for the kill. That means ventilate, don't let it sneak up behind you by fillng the space with toxic, flammable fuel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I prefer a more simplified biological approach to support Frank Brannigan. The symbiosis of fire and the building is parasitic in nature. The fire needs the building and contents to grow. The building lends itself readily to this friendship. To modify an old saying I conclude that "the friend of my enemy is my enemy."
    We'll consider the firefighter's endosymbiosis or lack of later. Thanks for the thought provoking post, and comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chris, Good post! I often make the same statement. The fire is the enemy and the building is the ground we fight on (taking from both Frank Brannigan and Sun Tzu). A couple of corrections: Hartin not Hardin & CFBT stands for Compartment (as in an enclosure such as a room or building) Fire Behavior Training.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ed,
    Sorry, that's what I get for working from memory! I made the corrections.

    Chris

    ReplyDelete